HCG, Home Capital Group and CWB, Canadian Western Bank.

HCG aug 2011

HCG has surprised me by its strength. At the beginning of this year it looked to me as if the stock might start down, with the proviso that it might go up another $5. It did $4 and then started its decline. This is a great company that feeds on the discarded leftovers of the big boys, much of which is still high quality business considering the fastidious requirements these big banks often apply. The P/E is quite low at 8-9. Even so I doubt that they will escape the general downdraft banks inevitable will face in the near future. Going lower.

 

 

cwb aug 2011 b cwb aug 2011 s

My concern with Canadian Western Bank stems partly from their statement to the effect that they would finance anything that is yellow and spews diesel soot; read Caterpillar and other such machines. Which, of course, makes them more sensitive to the vagaries of the mining and construction industry and vulnerable to demand destruction should the good times come to an end. The history of banking in Canada, West of Ontario is also not all that inspiring given the experience of the Northland and Continental banks in the ‘80-ties, confirming the adage that the exception proves the rule by going bust in very short order.

In EW terms this rally over the past two or so years is most probable a B-wave, not a 5th as with HCG (perhaps). The A – triangle B – C is readily identifiable by both the channels and the Fibo ratio between the two. I have no idea what keeps the stock suspended at these lofty levels ( for about seven months the stock has traded at a dollar above or below $30!) but, assuming this analysis is correct, a fairly violent drop could be just around the corner.

HCG, Home Capital Group

I was wrong on this one, it just kept going. Here it is ;

hcg 2011

At $47 it hit the first trend-line and did fall back quite a bit but then found its composure again and has continued to go up, this time to the next trend-line at about $56. This too could still be a B-wave, or a 5th as I had assumed earlier. It really does not matter as this is where high is high enough in my opinion. Another $5 is still a possibility but not worth sticking around for, see chart below;

HCG 2011 2

HCG,Home Capital Group (housing market in Canada)

hcg june 2010

The above long term chart is of Home Capital Group, a company that came into existence sometime in the mid eighties. The company has grown in leaps and bounds and presently has a balance sheet just shy of $8bln or so. Its goal in life is not to compete with the big boys but to wait for the crumbs to fall of the table. By being innovative and actually making credit assessments they have thrived  and have done so in harmony with the big banks ( who themselves were not allowed to do mortgages until the end of the eighties) The big Canadian banks, in contrast to HCG, prefer not to make a serious credit assessment, preferring to throw their immense weight around and asking for, and getting, a lien on your first born, the right of offset wherever that may be available and a variety of other securities. Oddly enough, when you do go a little “sub prime” so to speak, you can actually end up with a better security by way of the , required, backing of the CMHC (Can. Mort. and Housing Corp. ala Fannie and Freddie) Interestingly HCG is the only (publicly traded financial institution) that I can think of that actually made new highs by a fairly substantial margin; a feat not even the cream of the crop, the Royal was able to do.

Looking at the chart through a EW pair of glasses I tentatively conclude that the most recent high was the end of a 5th wave and not a B wave as in most other stocks. If so a fairly large drop is in store for the company, which , by the way, is not a reflection of their management but simple because that is the way it is given the macro-economic forces bearing down on mortgages.

This brings me to the point I would like to make. We all know that the Maestro could not see a bubble if his life depended on it. I was therefore pleasantly surprised to see that Businessweek (now Bloomberg Businessweek) was able to suggest that we actually might have a bubble in the Vancouver area. I travelled there in 1986 and noticed that there were some nice properties on the island that could be had for $250.000 or so. Now a shack will put you down a million+. The article explains that the most favored instrument is a letter of assignment sold by developers. Something like an unregulated futures market and all of this in Canada! Perhaps things are a tad overdone and things will get a little more difficult, HCG certainly suggest that this may indeed be the case!