On Feb 5, 2011 we recommended buying this stock and selling it at just under $36. That blog is still in this website. Though we are a little unsure of how to account for the starts and ends, and the intervening B-wave, we are confident that this is a big A-B-C that most likely needs a drop to below the starting point of this leg up, that is $5. How far below we do not know. Just do not buy the stock because it getting creamed today! Also the C leg must be a 5 wave sequence. So far at least that does not appear to be the case.
Month: January 2016
BA, Boeing Co
We never expected this stock to trade above, say, $120 or so. (and before that much above $105). The B-wave did not materialize and simple proceeded to go onwards and upwards. Just last December, a few weeks ago, the 24 analysts that cover this stock unanimously thought it was a buy, those that didn’t changed their minds. Keep in mind that this is after a 5-fold increase in about the same number of years. The p/e is 16X and the yield 3.4%, pretty normal.
We are quite certain that you do not want to own this stock in the next few years. The EW pattern, though perhaps confusing in the middle, is perfectly straightforward at the end, which is a clear 5th wave from the lows of 2009 to the highs around $160. This expectation is not coloured in any way by moves of HQ or extra-curricular activities of senior management. The “logical” target is about $30.
EW is free of fundamentals, let’s look at them anyway;
Boeing has received huge tax incentives from the government and spends an offensive amount on share buy backs. Therefore both earnings and earnings per share are shown in the above tables from 2006 to 2013, a period that covers most of this 5th wave. Neither of these have grown anywhere near the same rate as the stock. Earnings per share are up by , maybe , 50%. Net earnings may have doubled on average.
Governments around the world are closer to being broke that ever before. This crimps military spending but also a good part of the civilian sector as many air carriers are essentially government owned or subsidized. In short we think this stock is a sell.
DE John Deere
See our previous blogs on DE. You are now down about 25% since we recommended selling this stock (and similar ones like CAT). At first we expected a 4th wave around this level and that appears to be what we got, at least it is a triangle. However triangles can be either a 4th wave or a B wave. Given the size relative to wave 2 it has occurred to us that this may in fact be a B-wave (in pink). The consequence of such a change is that we are already in a wave C and could continue the drop much faster than in the other interpretation.
Time will tell.
2 Charts
These are not “then and now” charts, they are both as of Jan. 15 2015, that is today. I have deliberately removed or obfuscated the names of the chart in order to leave you, the reader, to guess what they are, or represent. This is not a trick question, that is it is not the same chart twice!
You will notice immediately that the left chart rises at roughly twice the speed of the one on the right, both beginning around 2000 but the left one peaking at 3200 whereas the right one only manages 16000, half as much. Nevertheless all ups and downs on both charts correlate rather precisely and the proportions stay constant over the 28 year time frame. Furthermore the B-wave is very well articulated and in both cases more or less double tops, peaking at or near the upper trend line.
These charts are of entities that are oceans apart, have completely different economies and are subjected to totally different influence spheres. The only common element is that once upon a time they were both part of the British Empire all tough they matured in different ways.
Moving on, here are the then, March 20, 2015, and now charts for the index on the left ;
As usual the “wedge” was a super clear and predictive pattern. Also it targets the base which is still about 4000 points away at the very least. This is perfectly in line with our expectation for the other index to drop at least another 2000 points.
If you haven’t guessed yet, the charts are of HK’s and Toronto’s indices. Talk about the correlation approaching 1 globally.