TSX update

tsx aug 8 2014tsx aug 8 2014 s

With the TSX we can be reasonable confident that the “orthodox” high and the actual high are one and the same and that it occurred in 2007, this in contrast to, perhaps, the DOW. The count, despite some ambiguity perhaps with respect to the subdivisions of wave 3, also appears to be fairly straightforward. On top of that it is quite clear that the rise from the lows  of the Great Recession in 2009 is most definitely not a 5-wave structure but a 3-wave, corrective counter-trend affair. How it subdivides is debatable, as is the question whether or not it has peaked. With respect to that last point it is clear that we double topped and then some, and also that for the past 3 or so years we accomplished very little in terms of additional height relative to the 2011 top of the a-wave.

There is nothing from an EW perspective that would suggest that this index could not go another 1000 or so points higher (that is where the parallel upper trend line would run if drawn through the top). However, given what is transpiring in other markets it is highly unlikely that Canada can continue to do it all on its own as it has been doing the last little while. The 1000 extra points is not worth the potential loss of 7000 or more points should the C wave down start momentarily.  When in doubt, get out.

CMI, Cummings update

See our most recent blog. Today we are roughly twenty dollars lower!

cmi aug 2 2014

All this could also be a “wedge” 5th wave. Already ( on the semi-log chart!)we have a break of the lower trendline. Insignificant at this point but if it gets bigger from here it certainly starts to look very bad. The initial target, as always is at the base, in this case around $80 which would constitute a 50% drop from the peak. The question really is not why this might happen. It is more why did this Diesel engine maker ever get to $161.

CAC update

cac aug 1 2014

So far, so good. Down about 8% and wiping out the previous 9 months or so of gains. It is not immediately clear how this drop should be labelled. It is possible that a number of 1-2s started the process; alternatively a small wave 1 might be complete and we have just done an a-b with c still to follow for a wave 2. Whatever the count, 7 is never a complete sequence!  In any event this drop is not over. The minimum initial targets are at the base of these structures, 4050 or 3950 depending on how you interpret the wedge. More downside in other words. Same for the Dow, see previous blog;

dow aug 1 2014

MS, GE and C update

ms ge may 2012ms ge c july 26 2014

The chart on the left is from May 17th, 2012, slightly more than two years ago(see those blogs). At the time I wrote – “With all due respect to the Gainesville gang, it would seem to me that this chart looks a lot like GE and that it is conceivable that MS has done the entire correction!”. On the right is todays version, this time including Citigroup, C. All three of these stocks went through an a-b-c correction that wiped out 90% or more of their respective values AND, with the exception of Citigroup, the a and c legs were more or less equal and in one or two cases even the b leg was roughly equal to the a and c. All this suggested that this is one single , completed, structure. For clarity I repeat MS below;

ms july 26 bg 2014ley Common Stock Stock Chart  MS Interactive Chart - Yahoo! Finance _2014-07-26_07-44-13Morms july 26 2014

MS never makes a new low in 2012. If the chart uses monthly data this appears to be the case but it is not. Anyway from both these MS charts the a-b-c correction is clear as a bell. Interestingly, after insisting for years that the “orthodox” top was in 2000 and all of the above was just wave A, followed by a large B to now be followed by a large C down, the count has changed as per the most recent Theorist such that the B-wave, which is now often way above the start of A, has now become a 5th wave, and not just for these individual stocks but for the Dow (and other) index as well. The end result will be more or less the same but the opportunities along the way, to either make or lose a lot of money is very much path-dependent.  So at least these four stocks, that do not look as if the will make new highs soon, may actually already be in the next bull market. If so they cannot make new lows but that does not imply that they cannot get close.