We did not expect such a large rebound in the Nikkei as we had the past half year. In fact we expected the index to make a new low somewhere in the neighbourhood of, say, 5000. The Japanese have undergone a renaissance in mercantilism, monetary expansion and deficit financing all on a scale previously unheard of. Will it all work, or will it work at all? A few inconvenient facts makes one wonder where this will all go. At 240% of GDP government borrowings are on a scale not seen anywhere else. Should rates approach 2.5/3% on government bonds the entire intake by the government will be needed for interest expense. The population is starting to shrink at an alarming rate which is only expected to accelerate. Competition is pretty fierce and there is not much love lost between Japan and some neighbours. It all begs the question how far they can take this before it blows up. We will see.
Year: 2013
H&RBlock, HRB
We have absolutely no idea how to count these charts in EW terms. Nevertheless the recent double top and an approaching upper trend line (at around $34 +/-) make us very nervous. A p/e at about 24 does not help much either. Also their low-end approach to filing is quickly being overtaken by dozens of self-help internet programmes that are available for free. The typical “interview” approach is probable as efficient and accurate as dropping of a shoebox with T-slips etc. We are inclined to step aside right here.
EMP.a (Sobeys) revisited.
More than a year and a half ago we thought this stock had hit a high at $65, give or take. The reason was that a very nicely formed wedge had traced itself out into that peak. Turns out that that was not the peak. Probably the wedge had a 4th wave triangle to kill time (more than a year), but otherwise the structure is still a wedge. It should have peaked today.
Inline with the good=bad and vice versa world we live in ,it is perhaps interesting to note that for time immemorial the company stock doing the take-over would decline and the subject company’s would rise. This is simple logic that follows from the process that the respective companies go through. Furthermore the main risk is invariable that the deal falls apart, not that it comes together. So arbitrageurs typically go short the target and long the predator. Ltely this is not happening. Now both companies go up. This sort of action defies logic, but usually just for a very short period of time.
CAG, Conagra
Conagra is at a very interesting point. It could go higher if it manages to decisively break the $36 double top level that has held for the past 16 years. If not it could lose 2/3 of it’s value as it returns to the level of a previous 4th wave. Mathematically a new high would target approximately $45 and a new low $15. The risk /reward favours getting out, but a tight stop-loss may work just as well.