DOW update

dow aug 12 2013

The Jaws of something pattern does not exist as far as I am concerned. Nevertheless it is possible to get  similar result by labelling the patterns in a proper way. There seems to be general agreement that we are at the end of a wave 3 of a 5 wave sequence starting sometime during the industrial revolution. The conclusion , therefore, must be that we are in some 4th wave of a similar large degree. Many believe that the actual top of wave 3 occurred in 1999/2000, which might be appropriate considering the change in century , the tech debacle  and Y2K. 4th waves often take the form of triangles, sometimes expanding horizontal ones. That would fit perfectly right here and explains, to some extent, the wild gyrations we have had over the past 10/15 years. A fourth wave horizontal expanding triangle is a perfectly legitimate structure in the vocabulary of EWers. It is a 3-3-3-3-3, a-b-c-d-e, 5-wave structure that typically ends at the bottom trend line or, at least, near it.

If correct the market has a little way to go up to say , roughly, 16000 and then the market should collapse to about 6000, not a big feat considering that it has done that already twice in this one , single, 4th wave. If the count is correct, the market should recuperate and make a new high in wave 5 to finish the 300+ 5-wave sequence. That would complete wave 1 of some super degree to be followed by wave 2. You do not want to ride that one out!!

I have used a semi-log scale chart as it tends to put the moves in a better perspective.

SII, Sprott Inc.

sii aug 11 2013 bsii aug 11 2013

Now more than 4 years ago it was Eric Sprott who decided to do a “night of the bears” for Toronto’s financial community. (it was actually his daughter who came up with the idea if I am not mistaken). For the occasion one Kim Parlee of BNN fame was recruited to be the MC/moderator and as guests Ian Gordon (longwave cycle, Kondratieff, not EW.), Meredith Whitney and David Rosenberg (then economist at ML, now Gluskin Scheff) were invited. All three had and have a reputation of being a little bearish , contrarian and iconoclastic , much like Sprott himself. The venue was one of the older theaters in Toronto, the Pantages Theater and the place was packed. Despite the dismal subject, it was a great success.

The timing could not have been worse. It coincided, almost to the day, with the lows in the US and other markets but this is not unusual given the lags in time needed to organize such a large event. In any event they got the timing of the IPO, almost a year earlier, much better. The stock was oversubscribed and immediately crashed with everything else which is a little odd given the company’s reputation for being contrarian and doing much of their business with that elite class known in Canada as “accredited investors”. A designation that seems to be entirely based on the conspicuously false premise that money=smarts. By the way, ex-stockbrokers get a lifetime exemption regardless of money or smarts. In any event the stock recuperates in tandem with the new gold rush , double tops (remember to always sell) and then dives down again to make a new low. In EW terms this is a big “flat”, an A-B-C that goes predominantly sideways following a 3-3-5 structure. (If the second top was the real high a zig-zag is another possibility). The whole mess is hard to count but at least there is a fairly distinct wedge that could be and probable is a 5th wave. To sum it up this stock looks more like a buy than a sell to us. The irony , of course, is that the night of the bears was either too late or way too early, which is why they say that timing is everything. Well this is the time to buy. Our initial target is about $5 which is the base of the wedge down and also near the apex of a triangle wave 4 (if there is one). Both the RSI and MACD support our view.

IMG, IamGold update

img aug 10 2013 bimg aug 10 2013 gnm

This is a little superfluous, using two charts, but it illustrates the point that you can prove almost anything  and that depending on the chart, monthly, daily, hi-low or close etc.etc. the outcomes can differ tremendously. We have toyed with the idea that this might be a buy, see previous blogs. It sports a dividend of nearly 5% and a p/e that is very seductive at 8.6X, at least according to the folks at big chart.  The EW structure is a clear zig-zag A – B – C down in which C is almost equal to A (not quite on Bigcharts, but already so on Globe+Mail chart). Presently we are sitting just above or just below the line connecting the lows and with a low of $4 coming from $23 in about a year and a half, there is no doubt that this stock experienced a bear market like few others. Provided there is nothing fundamentally wrong with this company, and we are not aware of anything, this one SHOULD be a buy on the basis of buy-low-sell-high. This would most certainly be the case if the stock approaches $2.

BB update

bb aug 9 2013

If you bought this, without thinking, as suggested you would be up a little more than 10%. Keep it for a little longer as the shorts in the US amount to 30.68% of the float. In Canada I do not have a number but on BNN they were talking about 40% total shorts. Furthermore there are now talks about this stock going private again. The combination of the two could produce some fireworks soon. From a pure EW standpoint, the a- triangle b- c correction is exactly that , a correction. This implies that the stock should trade above $18 some day in the not too distant future. This is a good risk/reward situation. Time will tell