A little while ago I was itching to buy Teck, not only do I love tech stocks but it had dropped so much that it was only $3 plus away from oblivion and I asked myself at what point does value become deep value? Of course this is all academic if you, or your broker , ignored the warning signs given by not two, but 3 tops at the lofty $52 level. On second thought, looking at this chart, I am not at all convinced that it is a buy. It is very clearly not a 5-wave down so far so more should be coming down the road. Of course at $5 there is not much to lose. Even so it could still be 100%.
Month: February 2009
PFE Feb 2
Â
Pfizer is the largest drug company in the US. As with most of these companies their modus operandi differs from the run-of-the-mill, straight vanilla, companies’ way of doing business. Unlike, for instance GM, that has simple met ( not lately) demand for the past hundred years, drug companies do not just meet demand. For the most part they are responsible for creating it as well , and actually spend more on marketing than R&D. Being bureaucracies they are not very good at research and consequently rely very heavily on smaller drug companies where the incidence of the “eurekaâ€Â moment is far more frequent and then taking them over by way of making an offer that cannot be refused. All of this with patent protection, now up to 20 years , and many other little loopholes to boot, and you have a great model that almost guarantees outlandish profits. But remember that they are skating on very thin ice. No real demand, generic competition, government subsidies and an iffy legal framework for protection, and most importantly, an efficacity of less than 60% according to BW, a very volitile brew!
   Not being a user of medication other than the odd aspirin, I do not have a first-hand understanding of the the difference between a “needâ€and a “want†when it comes to things like Lipitor or Viagra or whatever. What does seem pretty clear to me is that the day is coming, and coming soon, that this is all going to deflate  and shrink back to normal. Perhaps tomorrow, governments all over the world will figure out that a good book will be as good a cure as any,better perhaps than the no-cost placebo, and stop paying for this. Not good for big pharma.
    But big pharma has been down for 10 years now so in the meantime a little renaissance may be around the corner. Pfizer looks like a good buy for the short –term. See chart, it should hit a low soon and then rebound nicely. Not sure what the WYE deal does for it. 60+ billion is a lot of money to pay for someone else’s pipeline. Maybe why the stock cratered recently.
PD.UN full circle over 10 years?? Feb2
There was a time that oil traded at about $10 that a brand new drilling rig worth millions could be had for perhaps as little as a few hundred thousand dollars and that PD (then not an income trust) briefly traded under about $14 (it has split 3 to 1 ?since, so that would have been about $5 in today’s terms). That was 1998, I loaded up on the stuff and got out at about $20 – for a very brief moment believing my own genius only to watch it go straight into the stratosphere. Now , give or take 10 years later, we may once again be at the same juncture.
There is a credible 5 wave pattern down that may not be completely finished but cannot go that much further. Should we not begin a new bull, at least a counter-trend move of $10 or so is very much in the cards. For those readers that are completely without prejudice or bias, it is also a comfort to know that the top dog is Dutch.
Comments are on under the “no comment†tab, just click on it.
TLT long bond ETF Feb 2
I am not that familiar with this ETF, however as I cannot get the actual futures , with which I am very familiar, this will have to do. As you can see from the chart , this resembles the action of the bi-plane stunt flyers at the air-show. First vertically up and then, as momentum is lost, that is the weight of the plane exceeds the thrust of the engine, straight back down into its own exhaust fumes. There is a big difference however, flying the plane (I should know ) is a hell of a lot cheaper than owning this stuff. Whereas you can rent a decent (wet) Cessna for under $200 an hour at , for instance, Buttonville airport, the bond would have cost you $200.000 per million from the top. More importantly the stunt plane has a pilot and is therefore controlled, the long bond does not have anything similar, certainly not the Fed. First to 95, then a crash landing??